jili tutorial

UK Prediction Markets in Focus: FCA to Revisit Retail Binary Options Ban

By jili tutorial · September 8, 2026

UK Prediction Markets in Focus: FCA to Revisit Retail Binary Options Ban

A Further Step Towards Wider Retail Investment Access

The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is preparing to revisit whether everyday consumers should be given more room to invest in products that are currently considered too risky or too speculative. This review could put the UK’s ban on retail binary options back under the spotlight as early as September, and it may also create a clearer path for prediction markets to operate legally in the country.

The regulator has said it will consider “whether further work on access to these products is needed” after publishing a wider Discussion Paper on expanding consumer access to investments. That paper, which was opened in December 2025, was designed to gather views from consumers, industry bodies, and other stakeholders on how the FCA can improve confidence in investing. Specially designated “speculative products” were explicitly included in that scope.

The consultation closed in March, and the FCA has since committed to publishing an official statement on the feedback in the third quarter of the year. With that deadline approaching, attention is now turning to what the regulator might do next. The FCA has said that, once feedback is published, it “may consult on the issues discussed in the paper in due course.”

What Are “Speculative Products”?

In this context, speculative products include financial instruments that behave like bets on uncertain outcomes. Binary options are the most prominent example. They are contracts that pay out a fixed amount if a certain condition is met by a specific time – for example, whether a stock price will rise or fall by a certain date. If the prediction is wrong, the buyer loses the entire stake.

This all-or-nothing structure is exactly why the FCA has classified certain prediction market offerings as binary options rather than conventional investments.

Why Did the FCA Ban Binary Options in 2019?

The FCA banned the sale of binary options to retail consumers in 2019. At the time, the regulator cited serious concerns that retail investors could suffer significant financial losses and that the risks of these products were not properly understood.

Binary options have a gambling-like appeal: the outcome is binary, the payout is fixed, and the contract usually expires quickly. That combination can encourage repeated trading and impulsive decisions, especially among less experienced investors. The FCA’s view was that these products offered little genuine investment value while carrying a very high risk of consumer harm.

The ban was described as permanent. The FCA’s position was that the “speculating, gambling-like nature of these contracts and the high risk of consumer harm” made them unsuitable for retail consumers.

The ban effectively stopped UK-based firms from offering binary options to ordinary consumers, including many prediction market products that rely on binary contracts.

How Prediction Markets Fit Into the Picture

Prediction markets are platforms where users trade contracts based on the likelihood of future events. These can include financial outcomes, such as whether a particular index will close higher or lower, as well as political results, sports outcomes, and cultural events.

Because prediction contracts are often structured as binary options – you buy a contract that pays out only if a specific outcome occurs – the FCA has treated many of them as speculative products. That classification placed them within the scope of the permanent ban, blocking UK consumers from accessing them through regulated UK platforms.

There is an important distinction, however, between different types of prediction markets:

That distinction could shape the future regulatory approach.

Industry Pressure and the Problem of VPNs

One of the most significant developments is the growing pressure from industry insiders to lift or relax the ban. According to The Times, “multiple stakeholders” have made representations to FCA-linked officials about the prominence of prediction markets in the UK.

A key concern is that UK consumers are not simply avoiding these products. Instead, they are going around the ban. Stakeholders have reportedly presented evidence of “millions of consumers using VPNs to access prediction markets overseas.” That means UK residents are using virtual private networks to appear as though they are browsing from another country, allowing them to place trades on platforms that are not regulated by the FCA.

This is a serious regulatory blind spot. Consumers who use VPNs to access overseas platforms lose the protections of the UK regulatory system, and there is no oversight of how those platforms handle funds, market pricing, or customer disputes.

The FCA has reportedly been in talks with trading stakeholders about these issues. Even though the official line is that the regulator “may consult” on the issues raised in the Discussion Paper, the range of discussions suggests that a formal review is becoming more likely.

The Two-Pronged Licensing Route

Even if the FCA does relax the rules around binary options and speculative products, prediction market firms would still face a complicated licensing process in the UK. The route they take would depend on the type of predictions they offer.

FCA Licensing for Financial Predictions

Firms that offer prediction markets on financial assets – such as indices, currencies, or commodity prices – would need to obtain a licence from the FCA. These products would likely be treated as financial instruments or investments, and the firms would need to meet the FCA’s standards on conduct, risk disclosure, and client money handling.

This would be a significant step. It would mean financial prediction markets could operate legally in the UK for the first time, but only under strict conditions designed to protect consumers.

UK Gambling Commission Licensing for Politics and Sports

Firms that focus on non-financial prediction markets, such as political elections or sports events, would follow a different path. They would need a betting intermediary licence from the UK Gambling Commission.

This structure already exists in some parts of the UK market. A notable example is Matchbook, a UK-based sports betting exchange that operates under a Gambling Commission licence. Its model allows users to back and lay outcomes, much like a prediction market, while staying within the legal framework for betting.

This two-pronged approach would mean that a single platform offering both financial and political prediction markets might need two separate licences from two different regulators. That would create additional compliance costs, but it would also provide clarity about which rules apply to which part of the business.

What Could Change for Consumers and the Industry?

If the FCA decides to revisit the ban, the most immediate effect would be a more open and transparent conversation about how prediction markets should be regulated. There are several possible directions:

For consumers, the upside of a regulated market would be access to prediction markets through platforms that are required to explain risks clearly and keep customer money safe. The downside would be that tighter regulation could make some products more expensive or restrict the types of contracts available.

For firms, the opportunity is significant. The UK is a large financial centre, and a regulated prediction market sector could generate considerable interest. But the burden of dual regulation, especially for platforms that want to offer both financial and non-financial events, could be a barrier to entry.

What Happens Next?

The FCA is expected to publish its official feedback on the Discussion Paper in the third quarter of the year. That statement will be the first major signal of whether the regulator is willing to move forward on prediction markets.

If the FCA decides to take action, the next step would be a formal consultation, during which industry participants and consumers would again be invited to share their views. Only after that could any rule changes be implemented.

In the meantime, the wider industry is continuing to build momentum. The Global Prediction Market Forum is set to take place in Lisbon on 1 October, bringing together operators, regulators, and investors from around the world to discuss the future of prediction markets. That event is expected to include conversations about the UK regulatory review and whether other countries might follow a similar path.

For now, the key questions remain open. Will the FCA treat prediction markets as investments, as gambling, or as something entirely new? And if the ban is relaxed, how quickly will regulated platforms enter the UK market?

The coming months could provide the first real answers.