The Gambling Wire: Prediction Markets Surge Past $9.4 Billion as Sports Betting Expands Into Nebraska
The Gambling Wire: Prediction Markets Surge Past $9.4 Billion as Sports Betting Expands Into Nebraska
Overview: A Week of Record Volume, Regulatory Battles, and Market Shifts
The gambling and prediction market industry experienced a whirlwind week, marked by staggering trading volumes, aggressive political lobbying, legal showdowns, and fresh academic insights into market behavior and public health consequences. From DraftKings and FanDuel pouring millions into Nebraska’s online sports betting campaign to Polymarket fighting Dutch regulators in court, the landscape is evolving rapidly. Below, we break down the key developments, provide context, and explore what they mean for investors, policymakers, and the public.
H2: Prediction Markets Hit New All-Time Highs
H3: Kalshi Leads the Charge With Over $7 Billion in Weekend Volume
Prediction markets recorded a historic weekend, with total notional trading volume exceeding $9.4 billion, according to data from Aldrin Research and TickerTracker. The standout performer was Kalshi, which alone accounted for $7.13 billion in volume across Saturday and Sunday. Sunday’s figure of $3.68 billion broke the previous daily record of $3.45 billion set just one day earlier.
What Drove the Surge?
- Sports and combos (parlay-style wagers) represented approximately 91% of Kalshi’s total volume.
- Football alone accounted for roughly $4 billion (56%) of Kalshi’s weekend total, with combos making up $3.1 billion and straight football markets contributing $897 million.
- Polymarket US also crossed the $1 billion mark again, though slightly below the prior weekend’s $1.25 billion.
- DraftKings Predictions recorded $372 million, up from $334 million the previous weekend.
- Novig saw a significant increase to $286 million, up from around $200 million.
Key Insight: Combos accounted for more than 50% of total volume on every major platform, highlighting a shift toward complex, multi-leg wagers that offer higher potential payouts but lower probability of winning.
H3: Why This Matters for the Industry
The sustained growth in prediction market volume signals a convergence of sports betting, financial speculation, and political forecasting. Platforms like Kalshi are blurring the lines between gambling and financial derivatives, attracting both retail traders and institutional interest. This trend is likely to attract increased regulatory scrutiny as lawmakers grapple with how to classify these products.
H2: Nebraska’s Online Sports Betting Push Heats Up
H3: DraftKings and FanDuel Inject Another $7 Million Into Campaign
As Nebraska voters prepare to decide on online sports betting in a November 3 vote, major sportsbooks are doubling down on their lobbying efforts. DraftKings and FanDuel each contributed an additional $3.5 million to the Tax Relief Nebraska campaign, according to the latest financial filing. BetMGM added another $250,000, bringing the campaign’s total contributions from July 28 to September 29 to $7.25 million.
Election-Year Fundraising Totals
- Total contributions for the cycle: $14.65 million
- DraftKings and FanDuel had each previously contributed more than $3.5 million
- BetMGM’s total now stands at $250,000
- Fanatics contributed $75,000 earlier but made no new donations in this period
H3: What Voters Will Decide
Nebraskans will consider two separate measures:
- A constitutional amendment allowing the legislature to authorize online sports wagering.
- A regulatory framework establishing licensing, taxation, and oversight rules.
If passed, the law would permit up to 12 mobile sportsbooks partnering with Nebraska’s six existing gaming facilities (casinos and racetracks).
Context: Nebraska currently allows in-person sports betting at licensed venues, but online wagering remains prohibited. This vote could make Nebraska the latest state to join the rapidly expanding U.S. online sports betting market, which is now legal in over 30 states.
H3: What’s at Stake
- Tax revenue: Estimates suggest online sports betting could generate tens of millions in annual tax revenue for Nebraska.
- Market share: For DraftKings and FanDuel, Nebraska represents a new frontier for customer acquisition in the Midwest.
- Public opinion: Opponents raise concerns about problem gambling and the social costs of expanded access.
H2: Regulatory and Legal Battles Heat Up
H3: Polymarket Takes Dutch Regulator to Court
Polymarket, the decentralized prediction market platform, is challenging an enforcement action that effectively banned it from operating in the Netherlands. The company argues that its contracts should be regulated as financial instruments rather than gambling products.
The Core Dispute
- Polymarket’s position: Its prediction contracts fall under the jurisdiction of the Authority for Financial Markets (AFM), not the Dutch Gambling Authority (KSA).
- KSA’s ruling: The regulator determined that Polymarket operator Adventure One QSS Inc. was offering gambling without the required license.
- Penalties: The company forfeited a €420,000 penalty ($471,000) for failing to comply with the KSA’s order on time.
- Timeline: The KSA rejected Polymarket’s administrative objection on June 23, prompting the current litigation.
Broader Implications
Polymarket has previously discussed its regulatory classification with European and U.K. regulators, arguing that prediction markets should be treated similarly to financial derivatives or stock indices. If the Dutch court rules in Polymarket’s favor, it could set a precedent that reshapes how prediction markets are regulated across Europe.
H3: CFTC Approves Kalshi’s Stock-Index Futures Contract
In a significant regulatory development, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has approved a Kalshi futures contract tied to a broad U.S. stock index. This marks another step in Kalshi’s expansion beyond event-based contracts (e.g., election outcomes, sports scores).
Key Details
- Product: US500 perpetual futures contract, submitted for review in August and approved on October 3.
- Features: Unlike traditional futures, the contract has no fixed expiration date. Instead, it uses regular funding payments to keep its price aligned with the underlying index.
- Broader impact: The same approval letter grants Coinbase and other qualifying exchanges temporary relief to remove expiration dates from similar stock-index products, subject to notice, exit, and disclosure requirements. This relief expires October 20.
Context: This approval signals that U.S. regulators are willing to accommodate innovative financial products that combine elements of futures, swaps, and event contracts—at least on a limited, experimental basis.
H3: Ontario Study Links Gambling Expansion to Rising ER Visits
A new study published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine documents a sharp increase in emergency department visits involving gambling disorders after Ontario transitioned from a single-operator model to an open online gambling market in 2022.
Key Findings
- Data period: January 2012 to June 2025
- Total visits: 952 visits involving 757 people
- Demographic impact: Increases were concentrated among younger males
- Males aged 10-29: 154% higher than projected
- Males aged 30-44: 116% higher than projected
- Overall rate: By Q2 2025, the visit rate was 99% higher than the rate projected if the market had not expanded
Limitations and Caveats
- Researchers could not determine how much of the increase was linked specifically to single-event sports betting versus the broader expansion of online gambling.
- Changes in whether people sought help or how doctors recorded gambling problems could also have affected the results.
Implication: This study adds to a growing body of evidence that liberalizing gambling markets can lead to measurable public health costs, especially among young men—a key demographic for sportsbooks.
H2: Academic Research Debunks Political Bias Claims
H3: New Study Finds No Systematic Partisan Bias in Election Markets
A working paper by Dartmouth economist Eric Zitzewitz, published by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), analyzed election prediction market data from 1880 through 2025 and found no consistent political bias favoring either side.
Key Takeaways
- No systematic bias: Across the samples studied, prices showed no consistent tendency to favor Republican or Democratic candidates.
- Recent elections: Bias was also absent when controlling for candidates’ sex, race, or age.
- Addressing a common concern: Critics have argued that traders’ political preferences could skew forecasts, but Zitzewitz found no systematic evidence of this—even though participants did not necessarily reflect the broader voting population.
Other Pricing Biases Identified
- Longshot bias: Most election markets overpriced longshots and underpriced favorites.
- Short-term polling bias: Separate markets on short-term polling changes showed a small bias toward left-leaning outcomes.
Limitations
- The paper has not yet been peer-reviewed.
- It does not yet include Polymarket data.
- Zitzewitz plans to add Polymarket figures and data from the 2026 midterm elections in a later version.
Why This Matters: The findings lend credibility to prediction markets as a forecasting tool, suggesting that even if traders have political leanings, the market mechanism corrects for individual biases. However, other structural biases (like longshot overpricing) remain.
H2: Business and Market Moves
H3: Maverick Owner Buys Back Eight Washington Casinos
Maverick Gaming owner Eric Persson announced he is buying back eight Washington casinos that had been named in closure notices, a move that could preserve approximately 850 jobs.
Properties Involved
- Great American Casino (Everett)
- Chip’s Casino (Lakewood)
- Macau Casino (Lakewood)
- Palace Casino (Lakewood)
- All Star Casino (Silverdale)
- Casino Caribbean (Yakima)
- Crazy Moose Casino (Pasco)
- Coyote Bobs Casino (Kennewick)
Background
- Maverick Gaming previously transferred these assets to RunItOneTime, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in July 2025 amid financial pressure.
- Persson expects the purchase to close in about three weeks, and the properties will remain open during the ownership transition.
- Maverick has also been involved in litigation seeking to expand sports betting in Washington beyond tribal casinos.
Context: Washington has a unique gambling landscape where tribal casinos hold exclusive rights to most forms of gambling. The Maverick saga highlights the financial risks and legal complexities of operating in such a regulated environment.
H3: Bank of America Sees Big Upside for DraftKings in Prediction Markets
Bank of America upgraded DraftKings stock to “Buy” from “Neutral” on Monday, citing the potential for prediction markets to become a meaningful earnings contributor—even as legal uncertainty hangs over the sector.
Revenue Projections for 2027
- Prediction-market fees: Approximately $400 million
- Market-making revenue: An additional $200 million to $400 million
- Total potential: Up to $800 million in new revenue streams
Analyst Reasoning
- Even if legal challenges restrict prediction markets, DraftKings could benefit as some activity migrates back toward regulated sportsbooks.
- The analysts retained a $27 price target for the stock.
Market Reaction
- DraftKings shares rose more than 7% intraday on Monday.
- However, the stock remains more than 40% lower for the year, reflecting broader market concerns about regulation, competition, and profitability.
Why This Matters: The upgrade underscores a growing belief that prediction markets are not just a niche hobby but a potentially lucrative vertical for established sportsbook operators—albeit one fraught with regulatory risk.
H2: Conclusion and Takeaways
The past week has demonstrated that the gambling and prediction market industry is in a state of rapid, multifaceted evolution. Key themes include:
- Volume explosion: Prediction markets are seeing unprecedented activity, driven by sports and combos.
- Regulatory tug-of-war: From Nebraska’s ballot measures to Polymarket’s Dutch court case, the legal landscape is being reshaped in real time.
- Public health concerns: New evidence from Ontario raises questions about the social costs of expansion.
- Market confidence: Academic research supports the integrity of election markets, while analysts see big revenue potential for operators.
As the industry continues to blur lines between gambling, finance, and forecasting, stakeholders—investors, regulators, and the public—will need to stay informed and engaged.
Related guides
- $1.35B Mega Millions Winner Drops Lawsuit: The Cost of Anonymity in a Record Jackpot
- $167M Powerball Winner Arrested for Fifth Time: A Cautionary Tale of Sudden Wealth
- $20 Ticket Turns into a $2M Payout in Illinois
- $320M Powerball Hopeful John Cheeks Still Fighting for Website Error Jackpot: A Comprehensive Guide to the Ongoing Legal Battle
- $4.6M Child Modeling Fraudster Blew Stolen Cash on Gambling, Taylor Swift Tickets