Stake Declared Illegal in Nigeria: A Comprehensive Guide to the Licensing Crackdown
Stake Declared Illegal in Nigeria: A Comprehensive Guide to the Licensing Crackdown
Overview of the Ban
On [date of original report], the Lagos State Lotteries and Gaming Authority (LSLGA) officially added the crypto-focused betting platform Stake to its “blocked list” register. This immediately prohibits Stake from operating in all 24 states that are members of the Federation of State Gaming Regulators of Nigeria (FSGRN). The ban is effective immediately, and blocking orders have been issued against the platform, which is licensed in Curaçao but not registered with Nigerian authorities.
The LSLGA has also initiated a public awareness campaign to inform Nigerian consumers that Stake is an illegal operator, urging them to stop engaging with the brand.
Why Stake Was Blocked: Non-Compliance and Tax Remittance Failures
The LSLGA stated that Stake “has failed to register, declare or remit applicable monthly gaming taxes and levies despite receiving no fewer than 10 formal compliance notices over the past two years.” This persistent disregard for Nigerian gaming law—despite multiple warnings—was the core reason for the ban.
Key Compliance Failures
- No local registration: Stake operates without a valid Nigerian gaming licence, despite targeting Nigerian users.
- Tax evasion: The company did not remit monthly gaming taxes and levies, which are mandatory for licensed operators.
- Ignored warnings: Over a two-year period, the LSLGA issued at least ten formal compliance notices, all of which were ignored.
This is not an isolated incident; it reflects a broader regulatory tightening in Nigeria’s online gambling sector.
Broader Regulatory Crackdown in Nigeria
Nigeria has the second-largest betting market in Africa, behind South Africa, with a Competitive Earnings Baseline (CEB) of $789 million according to the Blask Index. Given this massive market size, regulators are increasingly focused on enforcing licensing and tax laws.
Recent Enforcement Actions
- Withholding tax on winnings: The LSLGA recently implemented a 5% withholding tax (WHT) on gaming winnings, a measure designed to capture tax revenue from both operators and players.
- Bet9ja shutdown: Prominent Nigerian operator Bet9ja was shut down in Enugu following an order from the Enugu High Court, highlighting the judiciary’s role in enforcing gambling regulations.
- FSGRN collaboration: The Federation of State Gaming Regulators (FSGRN) coordinates actions across 24 states, making it difficult for unlicensed operators to evade the ban by moving between jurisdictions.
Despite lacking a licence, Stake was reportedly the 13th largest operator in Nigeria by market share, according to independent data. This demonstrates how prevalent illegal operations can become without enforcement.
Stake’s Global Regulatory Challenges
Stake is no stranger to regulatory scrutiny worldwide. The company’s reputation has been marred by a series of enforcement actions and controversies in other jurisdictions.
United Kingdom: Licence Revocation
In March of last year, TGP Europe, the white-label partner that held Stake’s UK Gambling Commission licence, was forcibly removed from the jurisdiction. This followed a series of marketing ploys that the UK Gambling Commission deemed unacceptable. Despite the licence loss, Stake still advertises in the UK through a sleeve shirt sponsorship deal with Everton FC—the club’s front-of-shirt sponsor for four seasons prior to the 2026/27 campaign.
Belgium: Unlicensed Ambassador
The Kansspelcommissie (KSC) , Belgium’s gambling regulator, has Stake under observation after legendary Belgian footballer Eden Hazard became a brand ambassador for the operator. Stake does not hold a Belgian licence, making any direct marketing to Belgian consumers illegal.
United States: Controversy with Drake
Stake’s US arm came under fire due to its high-profile relationship with rapper Drake, who frequently promoted the platform during live streams. Regulators in several US states investigated whether this constituted unlicensed gambling advertising.
Recent Licence Acquisitions and the Contrast
In 2026, Stake appeared to be turning a corner by securing licences in several regulated markets:
- Denmark
- Argentina
- Mexico
These licences suggested that Stake was regaining its reputation with regulators around the world. However, the Nigerian declaration shows that the company is still operating illegally in multiple jurisdictions, undermining the positive narrative.
Implications for Operators and Consumers
The LSLGA’s statement includes a clear warning to third parties:
“Banks, payment service providers, fintech companies, media organisations and digital advertising platforms are also urged to conduct appropriate due diligence and cease facilitating unlicensed gaming activities.”
This means that any Nigerian financial institution or media outlet that continues to work with Stake could face penalties. For consumers, the message is stark: engaging with an unlicensed operator carries risks, including loss of funds, lack of consumer protection, and potential legal consequences.
What Nigerian Consumers Should Do
- Verify whether an operator holds a valid state licence (list available from the FSGRN).
- Avoid platforms that are on the LSLGA blocked list.
- Report any suspicious or unlicensed gambling activities to local gaming authorities.
Official Statement from LSLGA and FSGRN
The LSLGA concluded its announcement with the following commitment:
“LSLGA and FSGRN remain committed to protecting Nigerian consumers, safeguarding minors, preserving market integrity and ensuring that gaming operators comply fully with applicable State laws and tax obligations.”
This reinforces the seriousness of the enforcement and signals that further actions against other unlicensed operators are likely.
Summary: A Setback for Stake’s Global Ambitions
The Nigerian ban represents a significant setback for Stake, especially given its recent efforts to legitimise itself through new licences. The company’s history of regulatory run-ins—from the UK to Belgium to the US—suggests that its business model often prioritises market expansion over compliance. For regulators in Nigeria and beyond, the message is clear: operating without a licence will not be tolerated, no matter how large the operator.
Related guides
- $24M Florida Slots Case: Owner Seeks Dismissal of RICO and Money Laundering Charges
- ADM Authorises Setka Cup Betting: BETER Gains Access to Italy’s Regulated Market
- ANJL: Ban on Licensed Online Casinos Could Double Brazil’s Illegal Gambling Market
- ASA Maintains Strict Gambling Ad Control: A Comprehensive Guide to Two New Rulings
- ASA upholds complaint against Midnite over AI-generated character in TikTok ad