Las Vegas Bridge Stopping Ban Upheld: What Visitors & Locals Need to Know
Las Vegas Bridge Stopping Ban Upheld: What Visitors & Locals Need to Know
The Controversial Ban Explained
A federal court has affirmed Las Vegas’ controversial ordinance prohibiting stopping or standing on pedestrian bridges along the Strip. The 2020 law imposes severe penalties - up to $1,000 fines or six months jail time - for anyone who stops or causes others to stop on these spans, which are prime photography locations near landmarks like the Sphere.
While city officials frame the ban as targeting unlicensed vendors and performers who congest walkways, the broadly worded statute technically applies to:
- Tourists taking photos
- Individuals resting
- Street performers
- Anyone pausing momentarily
Legal Challenge and Court Ruling
The ACLU’s Constitutional Arguments
The American Civil Liberties Union mounted a vigorous challenge on behalf of two plaintiffs:
- Brandon Summers: A violinist who earned tips performing on bridges since 2009
- Lisa McAllister: A wheelchair user concerned about penalties for necessary rests
The ACLU contended the ordinance:
✔️ Criminalizes ordinary pedestrian behavior
✔️ Violates First Amendment free speech protections
✔️ Contravenes Fourteenth Amendment rights through selective enforcement
Judge Dorsey’s Decision
U.S. District Judge Jennifer Dorsey upheld the regulation, determining:
- The law targets unprotected activities (vending, loitering) rather than speech
- Free expression remains possible while walking
- Though excessively broad (could specify times/bridges), the rule isn’t unconstitutional
Practical Implications for Visitors
Enforcement Reality vs. Legal Risks
Despite harsh penalties in the statute:
🔹 No selfie-takers have been arrested since implementation
🔹 Enforcement focuses on unlicensed vendors disrupting flow
However, the sweeping language means:
⚠️ Technically any pause could incur penalties
⚠️ Selective enforcement potential remains concerning
Photography Considerations
Popular photo spots affected include bridges near:
- The Venetian
- Bellagio fountains
- The new Sphere venue
Pro tips for visitors:
📷 Take moving shots or use bridges as pathways to photo locations
📱 Consider less congested times (early mornings)
What’s Next? Ongoing Legal Battle
The ACLU has appealed to the Ninth Circuit, arguing the law:
🗽 Could chill protected activities (like performance art)
⚖️ Creates unnecessary ambiguity about lawful conduct
Legal experts suggest possible outcomes include:
- Full upholding of the current law
- Requirement for more precise language
- Narrowing to specific prohibited behaviors
Balancing Safety vs. Public Access
This case highlights the difficult balance cities face between:
✅ Ensuring pedestrian flow and safety
✅ Preserving public spaces for enjoyment
Comparable regulations exist in:
📍 Times Square, New York
📍 The Las Vegas Stadium pedestrian walkways
📍 Chicago’s Millennium Park
Visitors should stay informed as this legal challenge progresses through appellate courts.
Related guides
- $24M Florida Slots Case: Owner Seeks Dismissal of RICO and Money Laundering Charges
- ADM Authorises Setka Cup Betting: BETER Gains Access to Italy’s Regulated Market
- ANJ Raises Alarm Over Excessive Risks in French Sports Betting as Wagers Surge to €11.5bn
- ANJL: Ban on Licensed Online Casinos Could Double Brazil’s Illegal Gambling Market
- ASA Maintains Strict Gambling Ad Control: A Comprehensive Guide to Two New Rulings