Is Finland’s playing field level? Hippos ATG’s compliance chief on starting from scratch

Finland’s New Regulated Online Gambling Market: A Comprehensive Guide for Operators

Overview: A Long‑Awaited Shift

Finland is finally moving away from its state‑monopoly gambling model toward a licensed, competitive online market. Operators can now apply for licences ahead of the July 2027 launch. This guide expands on the key insights from a panel at the SBC Summit in Lisbon, featuring Antti Koivula (Chief Compliance Officer, Hippos ATG) alongside other industry leaders. We’ll examine the market’s unique dynamics, the challenges for newcomers, and the regulatory landscape you need to understand before entering.


The Starting Line: A Built‑in Imbalance

Customer Bases That Dwarf New Entrants

Some operators will enter Finland’s regulated online market with millions of customers already on their books. Others will start with zero. This asymmetry was a central topic at the SBC Summit panel, where Koivula noted that MGA‑licensed operators can bring their existing Finnish players into the new regime.

This disparity raises a critical question: Is the playing field genuinely level? Koivula’s pragmatic answer: “There’s no point crying about it: it has been decided and everyone will have to live with it.” For new entrants, the priority must be aggressive customer acquisition and brand building from day one.

Why Customer Data Matters

Existing player data gives incumbents a massive advantage:

Example from other markets: When Sweden opened its regulated market in 2019, operators with existing (grey‑market) customer databases – such as Bet365, Unibet, and LeoVegas – quickly converted those players, leaving smaller newcomers to fight for leftovers. Finland will likely follow a similar pattern.


The Monopoly’s Legacy and the Push for Change

A Market Decades Overdue

Finland’s gambling monopoly was maintained through a single state‑owned entity, Veikkaus, formed in 2017 from the merger of three operators (Veikkaus, Fintoto, and Raha‑automaattiyhdistys). For Koivula, the natural moment to introduce competition was exactly that year: “It should have happened 10 or 15 years ago. … It’s easy to say now, but all the signs were there back then.”

The primary sign was a declining channelisation rate – the percentage of total gambling that takes place through legal channels. As players increasingly turned to unlicensed offshore sites, the state’s revenue bled away.

The Revenue Trigger: Money Talks

Koivula attributes the government’s eventual action to a simple factor: money. Veikkaus’s gross gaming revenue has fallen by roughly 45% – from about €1.7‑1.8 billion – and its payments to the state have dropped by a similar share. When a monopoly can no longer maximize tax revenue and consumer protection, the political will to open the market emerges.

Comparison: Denmark (similar population size) introduced a multi‑licence system in 2012 and now enjoys a channelisation rate above 90%. Finland’s rate was estimated at just 50‑60% before the reform – meaning nearly half of all gambling was unregulated.


Regulatory Readiness: A Cause for Concern

The New Supervisory Authority

On 1 July 2027, a brand‑new regulator (to be named) will take over supervision of the licensed market. Koivula’s main worry is operational readiness.

Staffing Levels: A Red Flag

Citing the regulator’s own publications, Koivula points out that Finland’s new authority will have less than half the staffing of its Danish counterpart – despite both countries having similar population sizes (about 5.5 million). Denmark’s Spillemyndigheden employs around 100 full‑time equivalents; Finland’s new body is projected to have fewer than 50.

Why staffing matters:

Without adequate resources, the regulator may struggle to enforce the rules, creating a window of vulnerability for both licensed operators and consumers.


Cultural Context: Gambling as a Way of Life

Finland’s market appeal starts with how much its citizens already gamble. Per‑capita gross gaming revenue (GGR) is among the highest in Europe, according to Koivula. This is no accident.

Under the monopoly, gambling was ubiquitous: slot machines in grocery stores, kiosks, gas stations, and even cafeterias. Veikkaus’s physical presence normalised gaming for decades. As a result, Finnish players are accustomed to betting and have a high willingness to spend.

Implications for operators:


The Incumbent’s Advantage: State Backing and Customer Wealth

Veikkaus: Still State‑Owned, Still Powerful

Despite the end of the monopoly, Veikkaus remains 100% state‑owned. Talk of a partial sale is growing, but Koivula does not expect any privatisation before 2030 at the earliest. That means the incumbent enters the competitive arena with:

New entrants, especially those starting from scratch, must accept that the playing field is not level. Koivula’s advice: focus on differentiation, innovative products, and niche segments rather than trying to outspend Veikkauss.


Key Dates and Milestones for Operators

Date/TimeframeEvent
Now – 2027Application window for licences open.
1 Jan 2027New regulatory authority’s director expected to start.
1 Jul 2027Market launch; licences take effect; Veikkauss’s exclusive right ends.
2030+Earliest possible partial sale of Veikkauss (speculative).

Note: Operators should apply early to allow for processing and prepare compliance frameworks months in advance.


What New Entrants Must Prepare For

1. Customer Acquisition from Zero

2. Regulatory Compliance

3. Licensing & Reporting

4. Black‑Market Competition


Conclusion: A Race Against the Clock

Finland’s regulated online market offers tremendous opportunity, but the odds are stacked against new entrants from the start. The incumbent Veikkauss enters with decades of brand equity and millions of active players, while the regulator may struggle to enforce the rules in its early months.

For Koivula and Hippos ATG, the countdown to July 2027 has begun. Whether the playing field can be levelled over time depends on how quickly the regulator builds capacity and how aggressively new operators can chip away at the incumbent’s market share.

Final takeaway: Success in Finland will demand a long‑term strategy, deep pockets, and a willingness to compete against a state‑backed giant. The only certainty is that the market will never be the same again.