jili tutorial

Inside the Messy Court Battle Between Carrot Top and His Alleged Extortionist

By jili tutorial · September 25, 2026

Inside the Messy Court Battle Between Carrot Top and His Alleged Extortionist

Overview: A Celebrity Extortion Case That Turned Personal

The Las Vegas comedy icon known as Carrot Top—real name Scott Thompson—has found himself entangled in a years-long legal fight with Brian Evans, a singer who once opened for him. What began as a professional relationship has devolved into a sprawling court battle involving allegations of extortion, a purported sex tape, suicide attempts, and dueling lawsuits. This guide breaks down the key events, legal arguments, and implications of a case that has captured attention far beyond the Strip.

The Alleged Extortion Campaign: A Timeline of Demands

How the Numbers Escalated

According to court filings and police reports, Evans allegedly demanded money from Thompson in exchange for not releasing an explicit video. The amounts shifted dramatically over a matter of weeks in 2024:

These escalating numbers are central to Thompson’s allegation that Evans was engaging in extortion—a criminal offense defined as obtaining money or property through coercion or threats.

The Video That Changed the Game

A 90-second video, published by Page Six on September 24, 2025, became a critical piece of evidence. In it, Evans addresses Thompson’s former legal team, stating: “At some point, things are no longer about settling, okay?” He boasts about spending 12 years fighting another case, saying, “I know how to file, and I know how to respond, and I especially know how to promote. So this is all up to you, all of you. You’re on the wrong side of this… But if this is the way you want it, this is the way it’ll be.”

Notably, the video does not mention a sex tape or demand money. Thompson’s lawyers argue its significance lies in what followed: emails, a police report, and a court filing that together paint a picture of a coordinated pressure campaign.

The Police Report and Its Limitations

On September 3, 2026, Thompson’s attorney Ronnie Bitman filed a report with the Lake Mary Police Department in Florida. Bitman told officers that Evans claimed to possess a USB drive containing “sensitive contents of an explicit video about the client,” and that Evans wanted $500,000, threatening to send the file to tabloids if Thompson refused. Police logged the incident as “information only—extortion of client,” but no criminal charges were filed. The officer noted that Thompson lived outside the city’s jurisdiction and would need to report the crime to his local police.

The Broward County Filing

That same day, Bitman filed a motion in Broward County court repeating the allegations: Evans was demanding “significant sums” and warning that an alleged sexually explicit recording could be placed in a public court file, where journalists could copy it. These claims remain unproven allegations, but they set the stage for a protracted legal battle.

Evans Denies Extortion

Evans has vigorously denied the extortion charges. In a statement to Page Six, he said he “never threatened, ever, to post any video anywhere in exchange for a settlement.” He described the $500,000 note as confidential settlement talk and claimed the footage was deleted under a 2024 agreement. Evans is now suing Thompson in Broward County to unwind that settlement, arguing that he suffered psychiatric injuries after the 2023 Maui wildfires left him unable to legally consent. He also alleges that Thompson once texted him unsolicited explicit footage—an accusation that has not been proven.

Judicial Responses: Clipping Evans’s Paperwork

Labeled a “Vexatious Litigant”

In August 2026, U.S. District Judge David Leibowitz, presiding over a separate case in the Southern District of Florida, labeled Evans a “vexatious litigant.” The judge cited at least 15 “serial, spurious” cases Evans had filed in that district since 2025. Leibowitz dismissed the case before him with prejudice and barred Evans from filing new cases there without prior court approval.

Limits on Emergency Motions

In Broward County, Judge Shari Africk-Olefson found that Evans—acting as his own attorney—had abused emergency-motion procedure. After Evans agreed in court, the judge limited certain references to unrelated videos and text messages. Thompson’s team is seeking even stricter measures: judicial sign-off before public filings about alleged private or sexual conduct, and limits on unsupervised e-filing.

The Human Toll: Thompson’s Suicide Attempt

On September 18, 2026, Thompson was hospitalized in Las Vegas following a suicide attempt. His lawyers confirmed the news to the judge, writing in a motion: “This is now an emergency in the most human sense.” They asked the court to screen Evans’s future filings to prevent private sexual allegations from hitting the public docket and becoming national news overnight. No court has found that Evans caused Thompson’s suicide attempt, but the incident underscores the emotional weight of the case.

Context and Broader Implications

What Makes This Case Unusual?

Similar Cases in Entertainment History

These examples show that while extortion cases are not uncommon, the specifics of Thompson’s case—including the voluminous emails, the police report, and the suicide attempt—make it particularly complex.

What Happens Next?

The civil case against Evans remains ongoing. Thompson’s health reportedly continues to improve, but the legal fight is far from over. Key questions include:

For now, the battle between a Las Vegas icon and his former opener remains a messy, high-stakes drama—one that shows how quickly a professional relationship can spiral into a legal nightmare.