jili tutorial

Dutch Parliament United on Illegal Market Enforcement: A Comprehensive Guide to New Regulatory Developments

By jili tutorial · September 8, 2026

Dutch Parliament United on Illegal Market Enforcement: A Comprehensive Guide to New Regulatory Developments

Overview: A Turning Point in Dutch Gambling Regulation

On Thursday, the Dutch House of Representatives held a three-hour Gambling Committee debate that signaled a significant shift in the country’s approach to gambling regulation. While politicians from across the spectrum disagreed on several issues, they found rare unanimity on one critical front: the need for tougher, faster enforcement against the illegal gambling market. This guide unpacks the debate’s key outcomes, provides context on the current state of the Dutch gambling sector, and explains what these developments mean for operators, platforms, and players.

The Illegal Market: A Shared Concern Across Parties

Why Channelization Matters

The debate centered on a crucial metric: channelization—the proportion of gambling activity that takes place within the legal, regulated market. According to the Kansspelautoriteit (KSA), the Dutch gambling regulator, channelization has dropped below 50%. This means more than half of all gambling in the Netherlands now occurs via unlicensed operators, a stark decline from earlier years when the regulated market was expected to capture the majority of play. The 2021 legalization of online gambling was intended to bring players into a safe, taxed environment, but recent tightening of restrictions and tax increases have driven many back to the black market.

Unified Call for Stronger Enforcement

Ten committee members, representing parties from the ChristenUnie, PRO, SGP, VVD, and others, voiced their opinion that enforcement against illegal operators must be intensified. Members pushed for the government to grant the KSA greater powers to block illegal websites, drawing a parallel to the swift legal mechanisms used to address terrorist and child pornography sites. The government’s response, delivered by Justice State Secretary KT van Bruggen, confirmed that the cabinet is developing legislation to introduce DNS blocking for illegal sites, with a public consultation expected in early 2027.

Example: DNS blocking works by preventing internet service providers from resolving domain names of blacklisted sites. In the Netherlands, this approach has already been used for copyright infringement; adapting it for illegal gambling would give the KSA a powerful tool to shut down access quickly.

Collaboration with Meta and Google: A New Front in Advertising Enforcement

Social Media as a Gateway to Illegal Gambling

A growing problem highlighted in the debate is the proliferation of illegal gambling advertisements on social media platforms. Despite the Netherlands’ strict advertising rules for licensed operators, unlicensed sites continue to promote themselves via targeted ads on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube. The Dutch gambling sector has already taken legal action against Meta to curb this practice, but politicians demanded more systemic solutions.

Government’s Open Dialogue with Tech Giants

State Secretary Van Bruggen revealed that Meta and Google have expressed genuine openness to dialogue. “Meta, especially as one of the parties, but also Google, is really open to this conversation,” she stated. The government will now receive a six-monthly report on illegal gambling advertising across these platforms. However, Van Bruggen also emphasized that the issue should be tackled at the EU level through the Digital Services Act (DSA), which imposes obligations on large platforms to address illegal content.

The VVD party urged a “harder stance” against big tech, suggesting that voluntary cooperation may not be enough. Without stronger legal pressure, platforms may lack the incentive to proactively remove illegal gambling ads.

The Gambling Age Debate: 18 vs. 21

A Recurring Proposal

Raising the legal gambling age from 18 to 21 was once again put on the table. This is not a new idea—a 2025 bill proposed raising the age for “higher-risk” activities like online slots. During the debate, SGP’s Diederik van Dijk and CDA’s Tijs van den Brink were among the most vocal advocates for an increase. They argued that 18-year-olds are particularly vulnerable to gambling harm and that aligning the age with alcohol and tobacco laws (21 in some contexts) would improve protection.

State Secretary’s Cautious Response

Van Bruggen insisted that more evidence is needed before making such a move. She highlighted a potential unintended consequence: raising the age to 21 could push young adults toward unlicensed operators who do not enforce age checks, thereby worsening the illegal market problem. The matter will be revisited in future progress reports, but only after the black market is brought under control.

Context: The Netherlands’ legal gambling age of 18 aligns with many European countries, but several jurisdictions (e.g., some US states, Greece) have set the limit to 21 for specific forms of gambling. Research on the impact of age increases remains mixed, with some studies showing reduced participation and others indicating displacement to illegal channels.

Calls for a Full Reversal of Gambling Legalization

Van Dijk’s Radical Proposal

Beyond raising the age limit, Diederik van Dijk of the SGP called for a complete reversal of the 2021 online gambling legalization, which established a regulated market. He argued that the legal framework has failed to protect players and has instead fueled addiction and harm. Van Dijk also demanded a total ban on all gambling advertising—including for lotteries and land-based casinos—and questioned the government’s ongoing involvement with state-owned operators.

State-Owned Entities Under Scrutiny

Holland Casino and Nederlandse Loterij are state-owned, creating a potential conflict of interest: the government profits from gambling while also regulating it. Van Dijk pressed for a reassessment of how to limit harms, especially given that the government owns the largest casino chain. Holland Casino CEO Petra de Ruiter recently defended the operator’s player protection measures, noting the existence of a responsible gambling board that includes scientists, experts with lived experience, and internal RG executives. This board meets every few months to evaluate processes and challenge the operator’s ideas.

Example of protection measures: Holland Casino’s board has implemented mandatory breaks, deposit limits, and personalized player feedback. However, critics argue that such measures are insufficient when the operator has a financial incentive to maximize play.

Government’s Stated Priorities: Enforcement First

A Clear Roadmap

State Secretary Van Bruggen laid out the government’s priorities succinctly: “It is time to tackle that illegal offer properly, so that we can move towards a time when we do have to move towards an age increase. If that turns out not to be necessary, then we don’t do it.” This means that strengthening black market enforcement—through DNS blocking, payment provider action, and cooperation with tech platforms—will take precedence over raising the gambling age. Only once channelization improves will the age debate be revisited.

Implications for the Dutch Market

For licensed operators, this signals a period of increased regulatory focus on the illegal market, which could level the playing field if enforcement effectively shrinks the black market. For affiliates, payment providers, and social media platforms, the message is clear: facilitating illegal gambling will face tougher penalties. At the EU level, the Digital Services Act may become a key tool for holding major platforms accountable.

Key Takeaways

IssueOutcome
Illegal market enforcementUnanimous support for tougher action; DNS blocking legislation in development
Collaboration with Meta/GoogleGovernment to receive six-monthly reports; EU-level action via DSA
Gambling age (18→21)Deferred until illegal market is under control
Full reversal of legalizationProposed by SGP but not adopted by majority
State-owned operatorsScrutiny remains but no immediate changes

Looking Ahead

The Dutch parliament’s debate underscores a broader European trend: as regulated markets mature, governments are grappling with the persistent challenge of illegal gambling. The Netherlands’ approach—combining DNS blocking, platform cooperation, and cautious deliberation on age limits—could serve as a model for other countries. However, the success of these measures will depend on timely implementation and the willingness of tech giants and payment providers to cooperate.

For now, all eyes are on the early 2027 consultation for DNS blocking legislation. If executed effectively, it could restore channelization to healthier levels and reduce the harms associated with unlicensed gambling.