Democratic Bulgaria Tables Bill for Near-Total Gambling Ad Ban: A Comprehensive Guide
Democratic Bulgaria Tables Bill for Near-Total Gambling Ad Ban: A Comprehensive Guide
Background: Why This Bill Matters
In 2024, Bulgaria introduced restrictions on gambling advertising, but according to Democratic Bulgaria MPs, operators have consistently found ways to circumvent the rules. Now, the party has filed a bill (registration number 52-654-01-130) in the 52nd National Assembly on 9 September 2026 to close these loopholes and expand the ban to cover almost every remaining advertising channel. This guide breaks down the bill’s provisions, enforcement mechanisms, and broader implications for the gambling industry, regulators, and consumers.
The Problem with the Current 2024 Rules
The explanatory memorandum accompanying the bill states that parts of the 2024 package are simply not being applied. Compliance is not policed effectively, and operators have not acted in good faith. Specifically, the existing 5% cap on outdoor advertising—which limited billboard space for gambling ads to 5% of any outdoor provider’s total area—is neither observed nor controlled. The National Revenue Agency (NRA), which regulates gambling, cites organisational difficulties and, according to the memorandum, lacks the will to fix the issue.
Workarounds have become common. Examples include:
- Near-invisible risk warnings: Mandatory gambling risk warnings are displayed in tiny, unreadable fonts or colors that blend into the background.
- Disguised promotional content: News websites present editorial content that subtly promotes a gambling brand, skirting advertising definitions.
- Billboard placement loopholes: Billboards more than 300 metres from schools and playgrounds remain exempt under current law, allowing heavy advertising in residential and commercial areas.
Bozhidar Bozhanov, co-chair of Yes, Bulgaria and deputy chair of the Democratic Bulgaria parliamentary group, told reporters that gambling advertising continues to run on national television and across entire cities despite the restrictions. He stressed that a full ban on gambling itself would require careful assessment due to the risk of driving players toward illegal operators, so the bill focuses strictly on eliminating advertising.
Key Provisions of the Bill
The proposed amendments rewrite the advertising article of the Gambling Act. Below is a detailed breakdown of what would be banned and how definitions are being expanded.
Expanded Scope of Media and Channels
- Radio and television: The current reference to “radio and television programmes” would be replaced by the broader category “audio-visual media and radio services,” covering streaming platforms, podcasts, and other digital audio-visual content.
- Print and electronic media: The bill narrows “print and electronic media, including websites” to just “print media.” Websites are moved to a dedicated online provision (see below).
- Outdoor advertising: The existing 5% cap becomes an outright ban. This covers billboards, flags, advertising boards, banners, and similar physical displays. The exception allowing billboards more than 300 metres from schools, playgrounds, and other listed sites would be repealed entirely.
New Categories Targeted
Three new categories of advertising channels are added:
- Digital platforms: Websites, online news services, mobile applications, and online platforms covered under the EU Digital Services Act (DSA).
- Programmatic advertising: Providers of online advertising services as defined by the EU Digital Markets Act (DMA) would be subject to the ban.
- Direct marketing: Text messages, emails, or any other direct communication channels.
Tougher Warnings and Definitions
The mandatory gambling risk warning must now appear in a font and colour that is “clearly distinguishable” and “can be read without difficulty.” This effectively outlaws the tiny, camouflaged warnings currently used.
The definition of “gambling advertising” itself widens significantly. It now includes:
- Product and service placement.
- Any message, recommendation, or action that uses the name or trademark of a product, website, sports league, event, or venue that closely resembles that of a gambling operator.
This closes the loophole where operators sponsor sports events or leagues and then display their branding without explicitly advertising gambling.
New Enforcement Powers for the National Revenue Agency (NRA)
The bill equips the NRA with stronger tools to detect and stop illegal advertising.
Centralised Reporting and Transparency
- A single online form will be created for the public and industry to report suspected illegal gambling advertising.
- The NRA must publish monthly figures on violations and penalties, increasing accountability.
Direct Orders and Suspension Powers
The executive director of the NRA can:
- Order the immediate takedown of impermissible advertising.
- Suspend access to online advertising services (such as ad networks or programmatic platforms) that systematically ignore those orders—for up to one month.
Liability for Internet and Hosting Providers
- Revenue-sharing providers: Any internet or hosting provider that takes a share of gambling advertising revenue will be treated as directly breaching the ban. They cannot invoke the “passive transmission” defence (i.e., claiming they are mere conduits).
- Takedown deadlines: All internet and hosting providers (even those without a revenue share) must remove illegal content or restrict access within 12 hours of learning about it or receiving a removal order. Failure to do so makes them liable.
This is a major shift from the current EU e-Commerce Directive’s standard “notice-and-action” framework, which often allows longer periods. The 12-hour deadline sets a strict benchmark for Bulgaria.
Measures Aimed at Unlicensed Operators
Three provisions in the bill target illegal gambling itself, not just advertising. These are designed to cut off financial and discovery channels for unlicensed operators.
Crypto-Asset and Trading Platforms
Crypto-asset service providers and trading platform operators would be prohibited from transferring crypto-assets intended for online gambling to or from:
- Unlicensed operators.
- Operators that have been ordered to stop and are listed on the NRA’s public register.
This mirrors the existing ban on payment institutions and closes a growing avenue for circumvention using cryptocurrencies.
Cash Deposit Terminals
Cash deposit terminals (e.g., those found in convenience stores or betting shops) may not fund online betting accounts unless the customer’s identity is verified first. This prevents anonymous cash deposits from flowing to unlicensed sites.
Very Large Online Search Engines
Very large online search engines, as defined by the Digital Services Act, would be required to stop returning search results for unlicensed operators’ websites. This effectively forces platforms like Google to delist illegal gambling sites from Bulgarian search results.
Rationale and Political Context
Bozhanov explained to reporters that the bill’s focus is on removing advertising rather than imposing higher sanctions on gambling itself. A full ban on gambling remains off the table for now because it risks pushing consumers toward illegal, unregulated markets where player protection is nonexistent.
The Democratic Bulgaria party argues that the current regulatory environment is ineffective: compliance is low, enforcement is weak, and operators exploit every gap. The bill aims to create a “zero-tolerance” advertising framework where every channel—traditional, digital, outdoor, and direct—is covered.
Potential Impact on Industry and Consumers
If passed, the bill will have far-reaching consequences:
- Advertising industry: Outdoor advertising providers will lose a significant revenue stream. Online ad networks and programmatic platforms must implement compliance filters or face suspension.
- Hosting and internet providers: The 12-hour takedown requirement will force operational changes, particularly for smaller providers with limited resources.
- Consumers: Exposure to gambling ads would drop dramatically, potentially reducing the normalisation of gambling. Risk warnings will be more visible and effective.
- Illegal gambling: The measures targeting crypto, cash deposits, and search engines may shrink the black market’s reach.
However, enforcement will remain key. The bill’s success hinges on the NRA’s willingness and capacity to use its new powers—something the explanatory memorandum itself questions.
Conclusion
Democratic Bulgaria’s proposed bill represents one of the most comprehensive gambling advertising bans in the European Union, covering not only traditional media but also digital platforms, direct marketing, and search engines. By closing loopholes that operators have exploited since 2024, it seeks to make the ban watertight. Whether the NRA can enforce it effectively—and whether the 12-hour takedown requirement complies with EU digital services rules—remains to be seen.
Related guides
- $24M Florida Slots Case: Owner Seeks Dismissal of RICO and Money Laundering Charges
- ADM Authorises Setka Cup Betting: BETER Gains Access to Italy’s Regulated Market
- ANJL: Ban on Licensed Online Casinos Could Double Brazil’s Illegal Gambling Market
- ASA Maintains Strict Gambling Ad Control: A Comprehensive Guide to Two New Rulings
- ASA upholds complaint against Midnite over AI-generated character in TikTok ad